loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Marcussen; Henry.The latest application filed is for "airflow system for bagless vacuum cleaner".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Airflow system for bagless vacuum cleaner Grant 7,222,392 - McCormick , et al. May 29, 2 | 2007-05-29 |
Airflow system for bagless vacuum cleaner App 20070113372 - McCormick; Michael J. ;   et al. | 2007-05-24 |
Cyclonic vacuum cleaner with filter and filter sweeper Grant 7,070,636 - McCormick , et al. July 4, 2 | 2006-07-04 |
Airflow system for bagless vacuum cleaner App 20040025287 - McCormick, Michael J. ;   et al. | 2004-02-12 |
Cyclonic vacuum cleaner with filter and filter sweeper App 20040025285 - McCormick, Michael J. ;   et al. | 2004-02-12 |
Extractor with twin, counterrotating agitators Grant 6,030,465 - Marcussen , et al. February 29, 2 | 2000-02-29 |
Centrifugal dispenser for washing machine agitator Grant 4,118,957 - Marcussen October 10, 1 | 1978-10-10 |
Washing apparatus with auxiliary distributor Grant 3,890,987 - Marcussen , et al. June 24, 1 | 1975-06-24 |
Removable Clothers Basket For Dryer Grant 3,840,998 - Marcussen October 15, 1 | 1974-10-15 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.