loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Maples; Paul D..The latest application filed is for "contamination avoiding device".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Combustor flow sleeve attachment system Grant 7,805,946 - Ohri , et al. October 5, 2 | 2010-10-05 |
Contamination avoiding device App 20090125083 - Maples; Paul D. | 2009-05-14 |
Contamination avoiding device Grant 7,476,102 - Maples January 13, 2 | 2009-01-13 |
Contamination avoiding device App 20070283966 - Maples; Paul D. | 2007-12-13 |
Combustor flow sleeve attachment system App 20070130958 - Ohri; Rajeev ;   et al. | 2007-06-14 |
Silicone wax-based dry lubricant Grant 6,245,722 - Maples , et al. June 12, 2 | 2001-06-12 |
Dry lubricant Grant 5,898,022 - Maples April 27, 1 | 1999-04-27 |
Dry lubricant Grant 5,670,463 - Maples September 23, 1 | 1997-09-23 |
Spacerless feed channel membrane filter element Grant 4,944,877 - Maples July 31, 1 | 1990-07-31 |
Continuous chain lubricating device Grant 4,891,037 - Maples January 2, 1 | 1990-01-02 |
Water purification unit Grant D249,701 - Maples , et al. September 26, 1 | 1978-09-26 |
Reverse osmosis water unit Grant 4,110,219 - Maples August 29, 1 | 1978-08-29 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.