MANDLOI; Sapankumar K.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for MANDLOI; Sapankumar K..The latest application filed is for "method and system for device level authentication in electronic transactions".
- MANDLOI; Sapankumar K. - Stamford CT
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Method And System For Device Level Authentication In Electronic Transactions App 20220141003 - SRIVASTAVA; Abhinava ; et al. | 2022-05-05 |
| Method And System For Contactless Transactions Without User Credentials App 20220036348 - SRIVASTAVA; Abhinava ; et al. | 2022-02-03 |
| Method and system for contactless transactions without user credentials Grant 11,182,779 - Srivastava , et al. November 23, 2 | 2021-11-23 |
| Method and system for device level authentication in electronic transactions Grant 11,171,775 - Srivastava , et al. November 9, 2 | 2021-11-09 |
| Method And System For Device Level Authentication In Electronic Transactions App 20190190704 - SRIVASTAVA; Abhinava ; et al. | 2019-06-20 |
| Method And System For Contactless Transactions Without User Credentials App 20170308895 - SRIVASTAVA; Abhinava ; et al. | 2017-10-26 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 