loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Makishima; Reichi.The latest application filed is for "pipe coupling".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Pipe coupling Grant 6,827,329 - Mikiya , et al. December 7, 2 | 2004-12-07 |
Pipe coupling App 20040051070 - Mikiya, Toshio ;   et al. | 2004-03-18 |
Pipe coupling Grant 6,422,267 - Makishima , et al. July 23, 2 | 2002-07-23 |
Pipe Coupling App 20020062872 - Makishima, Reichi ;   et al. | 2002-05-30 |
Joint for connection of a corrugated pipe Grant 5,261,707 - Kotake , et al. November 16, 1 | 1993-11-16 |
Apparatus for connecting double vacuum pipes for conducting cryogenic fluid Grant 5,253,675 - Ooshio , et al. October 19, 1 | 1993-10-19 |
Coupler for connecting a specimen sampling bottle to a supplying pipe of a plant Grant 5,213,309 - Makishima May 25, 1 | 1993-05-25 |
Pipe coupler Grant D333,511 - Mikiya , et al. * February 23, 1 | 1993-02-23 |
Pipe coupler Grant D333,179 - Mikiya , et al. February 9, 1 | 1993-02-09 |
Double-pipe pipe coupling Grant 5,014,743 - Makishima May 14, 1 | 1991-05-14 |
Fluid coupling Grant 4,904,002 - Sasa , et al. February 27, 1 | 1990-02-27 |
Pipe coupling Grant 4,331,177 - Makishima May 25, 1 | 1982-05-25 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.