Mak; Kwok Ken
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Mak; Kwok Ken.The latest application filed is for "system and method for operating a packet buffer in an intermediate node".
- Mak; Kwok Ken - Chapel Hill NC
- Mak; Kwok-Ken - Wappingers Falls NY
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| System and method for operating a packet buffer in an intermediate node Grant 8,180,966 - Key , et al. May 15, 2 | 2012-05-15 |
| Synchronization technique for high speed memory subsystem Grant 7,469,328 - Mak , et al. December 23, 2 | 2008-12-23 |
| System and method for operating a packet buffer in an intermediate node App 20050169291 - Key, Kenneth M. ; et al. | 2005-08-04 |
| System and method for operating a packet buffer Grant 6,892,285 - Key , et al. May 10, 2 | 2005-05-10 |
| System and method for processing memory requests Grant 6,851,028 - Mak , et al. February 1, 2 | 2005-02-01 |
| Coherency coverage of data across multiple packets varying in sizes Grant 6,850,999 - Mak , et al. February 1, 2 | 2005-02-01 |
| Method and apparatus for high integrity hardware memory compression Grant 6,519,733 - Har , et al. February 11, 2 | 2003-02-11 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 