loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Magnusson; Lee Harris.The latest application filed is for "artificial joints using agonist-antagonist actuators".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Powered ankle-foot prosthesis Grant 11,278,433 - Herr , et al. March 22, 2 | 2022-03-22 |
Artificial Joints Using Agonist-antagonist Actuators App 20200022823 - Herr; Hugh M. ;   et al. | 2020-01-23 |
Powered Ankle-Foot Prosthesis App 20190175365 - Herr; Hugh M. ;   et al. | 2019-06-13 |
Powered ankle-foot prosthesis Grant 10,137,011 - Herr , et al. November 27, 2 | 2018-11-27 |
Artificial joints using agonist-antagonist actuators Grant 8,870,967 - Herr , et al. October 28, 2 | 2014-10-28 |
Powered Ankle-Foot Prosthesis App 20140088729 - Herr; Hugh M. ;   et al. | 2014-03-27 |
Powered ankle-foot prothesis Grant 8,512,415 - Herr , et al. August 20, 2 | 2013-08-20 |
Powered ankle-foot prothesis App 20110257764 - Herr; Hugh M. ;   et al. | 2011-10-20 |
Artificial Joints Using Agonist-Antagonist Actuators App 20100241242 - Herr; Hugh M. ;   et al. | 2010-09-23 |
Artificial joints using agonist-antagonist actuators App 20070162152 - Herr; Hugh M. ;   et al. | 2007-07-12 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.