Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Magnum Research, Inc..The latest application filed is for "conversion kit and method for a ruger 10/22 semi-automatic .22 caliber rim fire gun to shoot .17 mach 2 cartridges".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Conversion Kit And Method For A Ruger 10/22 Semi-automatic .22 Caliber Rim Fire Gun To Shoot .17 Mach 2 Cartridges App 20100170130 - Tertin; James A. | 2010-07-08 |
Conversion kit and method for a RUGER.RTM. 10/22.RTM. semi-automatic .22 caliber rim fire gun to shoot .17 mach 2 cartridges Grant 7,735,409 - Tertin June 15, 2 | 2010-06-15 |
Semi-automatic pistol Grant D614,716 - Tertin April 27, 2 | 2010-04-27 |
Conversion kit and method for a ruger 10/22 semi-automatic .22 caliber rim fire rifle to shoot .17 mach 2 cartridges Grant 7,302,881 - Tertin December 4, 2 | 2007-12-04 |
Aluminum composite for gun barrels Grant 6,482,248 - Holloway November 19, 2 | 2002-11-19 |
Composite tube for gun barrel Grant 6,230,429 - Smith May 15, 2 | 2001-05-15 |
Gas actuated pistol Grant 4,563,937 - White January 14, 1 | 1986-01-14 |
NCAGE Code | 0F6F3 | MAGNUM RESEARCH INC |
CAGE Code | 0F6F3 | MAGNUM RESEARCH INC |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.