loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Maekawa; Hiroko.The latest application filed is for "image tracking device and image tracking method".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Image tracking device and image tracking method Grant 5,530,771 - Maekawa June 25, 1 | 1996-06-25 |
Distance detecting apparatus for a vehicle Grant 5,304,980 - Maekawa April 19, 1 | 1994-04-19 |
Distance-measuring equipment Grant 5,255,064 - Maekawa * October 19, 1 | 1993-10-19 |
Distance measuring apparatus Grant 5,131,740 - Maekawa July 21, 1 | 1992-07-21 |
Device for detecting alcoholic content Grant 5,074,659 - Suzuki , et al. December 24, 1 | 1991-12-24 |
Optical transceiver apparatus for detecting distance between two cars Grant 5,039,217 - Maekawa , et al. August 13, 1 | 1991-08-13 |
Vehicle tracking control for continuously detecting the distance and direction to a preceding vehicle irrespective of background dark/light distribution Grant 5,026,153 - Suzuki , et al. June 25, 1 | 1991-06-25 |
Device for detecting alcoholic content Grant 5,015,091 - Suzuki , et al. May 14, 1 | 1991-05-14 |
Speed control apparatus for an automotive vehicle with creep control Grant 4,969,103 - Maekawa November 6, 1 | 1990-11-06 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.