Maeda; Yoshihito
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Maeda; Yoshihito.The latest application filed is for "reflective-type display device having a refractive index ratio between light scatterers and host between 1 and 1.8".
- Maeda; Yoshihito - Osaka JP
- Maeda; Yoshihito - Mito JP
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Reflective-type display device having a refractive index ratio between light scatterers and host between 1 and 1.8 Grant 5,828,431 - Ando , et al. October 27, 1 | 1998-10-27 |
| Optical disk memory and information processing apparatus Grant 5,475,656 - Sato , et al. * December 12, 1 | 1995-12-12 |
| Methods of varying optical properties, optical devices, information recording media and information recording methods and apparatuses Grant 5,420,845 - Maeda , et al. May 30, 1 | 1995-05-30 |
| Optical memory and information processing apparatus Grant 5,371,730 - Maeda , et al. December 6, 1 | 1994-12-06 |
| Information processing apparatus and optical head incorporated therein Grant 5,317,556 - Tsuboi , et al. May 31, 1 | 1994-05-31 |
| Information processor and disk memory used in the same Grant 5,274,612 - Sato , et al. December 28, 1 | 1993-12-28 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 