Maddipati; Srinivasa
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Maddipati; Srinivasa.The latest application filed is for "computing system with an email privacy filter and related methods".
- Maddipati; Srinivasa - Santa Clara CA
- Maddipati; Srinivasa - San Jose CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Secure sign-on using personal authentication tag Grant 11,323,431 - Cao , et al. May 3, 2 | 2022-05-03 |
| Computing system with an email privacy filter and related methods Grant 11,277,366 - Maddipati March 15, 2 | 2022-03-15 |
| Computing System With An Email Privacy Filter And Related Methods App 20210036978 - MADDIPATI; SRINIVASA | 2021-02-04 |
| Computing system with an email privacy filter and related methods Grant 10,826,855 - Maddipati November 3, 2 | 2020-11-03 |
| Automatic Generation Of Rides For Ridesharing For Employees Of An Organization Based On Their Home And Work Address, User Prefer App 20200286199 - Maddipati; Srinivasa ; et al. | 2020-09-10 |
| Secure Sign-on Using Personal Authentication Tag App 20200252389 - Kind Code | 2020-08-06 |
| Computing System With An Email Privacy Filter And Related Methods App 20200127953 - MADDIPATI; SRINIVASA | 2020-04-23 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 