loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Madabhushi; Ravi K..The latest application filed is for "double wall service tube with annular airflow passage".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Double Wall Service Tube With Annular Airflow Passage App 20190112946 - Matteson; Peter S. ;   et al. | 2019-04-18 |
Fire suppression system with improved two-phase flow distribution Grant 9,016,392 - Khalil , et al. April 28, 2 | 2015-04-28 |
Atomizing nozzle for a fire suppression system Grant 8,915,307 - Lelic , et al. December 23, 2 | 2014-12-23 |
Hybrid inert gas fire suppression system Grant 8,360,162 - Lelic , et al. January 29, 2 | 2013-01-29 |
Atomizing Nozzle For A Fire Suppression System App 20110259617 - Lelic; Muhidin ;   et al. | 2011-10-27 |
Fire Suppression System With Improved Two-phase Flow Distribution App 20110180276 - Khalil; Yehia F. ;   et al. | 2011-07-28 |
Flow Splitting Device For Annular Two-phase Pipe Flow App 20110108125 - Corn; May L. ;   et al. | 2011-05-12 |
Hybrid Inert Gas Fire Suppression System App 20100294518 - Lelic; Muhidin A. ;   et al. | 2010-11-25 |
Inert Gas Flooding Fire Suppression With Water Augmentation App 20100212920 - Lelic; Muhidin A. ;   et al. | 2010-08-26 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.