Lux; Martin

Patent Applications and Registrations

Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Lux; Martin.The latest application filed is for "catalyst comprising chromium and zinc for olefin polymerization and process for preparing it".

Company Profile

0.14.5

Lux; Martin - Schwarzenbach DE
Lux; Martin - Dannstadt-Schauernheim DE

*profile and listings may contain filings by different individuals or companies with the same name. Review application materials to confirm ownership/assignment.

Patent Activity

Patent	Date
Catalyst Comprising Chromium and Zinc for Olefin Polymerization and Process for Preparing It App 20080299342 - Schneider; Martin ; et al.	2008-12-04
Supported, Titanized Chromium Catalyst And Its Use For Preparing Homopolymers And Copolymers Of Ethylene App 20080177013 - SCHNEIDER; Martin ; et al.	2008-07-24
Supported, titanized chromium catalyst and its use for preparing homopolymers and copolymers of ethylene Grant 7,348,384 - Schneider , et al. March 25, 2	2008-03-25
Polymerization catalyst used for producing polyolefins that have excellent combined properties Grant RE40,140 - Mihan , et al. March 4, 2	2008-03-04
Supported, titanized chromium catalyst and its use for preparing homopolymers and copolymers of ethylene App 20060172884 - Schneider; Martin ; et al.	2006-08-03
Suspended chrome catalyst containing titanium and the use thereof for producing ethylene homopolymers and copolymers Grant 7,019,089 - Schneider , et al. March 28, 2	2006-03-28
Polymerization catalyst used for producing polyolefins that have excellent combined properties Grant 6,897,181 - Mihan , et al. May 24, 2	2005-05-24
Polymerization catalyst used for producing polyolefins that have excellent combined properties App 20040038810 - Mihan, Shahran ; et al.	2004-02-26
Suspended chrome catalyst containing titanium and the use thereof for producing ethylene homopolymers and copolymers App 20040014914 - Schneider, Martin ; et al.	2004-01-22
High mixture-quality bi-modal polyethylene blends Grant 6,545,093 - de Lange , et al. April 8, 2	2003-04-08
Low-odor polyethylene blends Grant 6,462,135 - Rohde , et al. October 8, 2	2002-10-08
Amidinato catalyst systems for the polymerization of olefins Grant 6,262,198 - Schlund , et al. July 17, 2	2001-07-17
Polymerisates of ethylene with a high degree of resistance to stress crack, and a catalyst system for the production thereof Grant 6,180,731 - Rohde , et al. January 30, 2	2001-01-30
Preparation of polymers of alk-1-enes in the presence of a supported metallocene catalyst system and of antistatic agent Grant 6,022,935 - Fischer , et al. February 8, 2	2000-02-08
Preparation of polymers of ethylene by suspension polymerization Grant 5,756,607 - Lux , et al. May 26, 1	1998-05-26
Amidinato catalyst systems for the polymerization of olefins Grant 5,707,913 - Schlund , et al. January 13, 1	1998-01-13
Preparation of a supported catalyst for the polymerization of .alpha.-olefins Grant 5,625,013 - Mueller , et al. April 29, 1	1997-04-29
Preparation of a supported catalyst for the polymerization of .alpha.-olefins Grant 5,455,216 - Mueller , et al. * October 3, 1	1995-10-03
Preparation of homopolymers of ethylene or copolymers of ethylene Grant 5,414,064 - Lux , et al. May 9, 1	1995-05-09

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.