Lumme; Martti
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Lumme; Martti.The latest application filed is for "infection-based monitoring of a party in a communication network".
- Lumme; Martti - Espoo FI
- Lumme; Martti - Helsinki FI
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Method and system allowing lawful interception of connections such a voice-over-internet protocol calls Grant 7,620,389 - Kallio , et al. November 17, 2 | 2009-11-17 |
| Infection-based monitoring of a party in a communication network Grant 7,487,238 - Pohja , et al. February 3, 2 | 2009-02-03 |
| Infection-based monitoring of a party in a communication network App 20050210127 - Pohja, Leena ; et al. | 2005-09-22 |
| Method and system allowing lawful interception of connections such a voice-over-internet protocol calls App 20040157629 - Kallio, Seppo ; et al. | 2004-08-12 |
| Interception system and method Grant 6,711,689 - Lumme , et al. March 23, 2 | 2004-03-23 |
| E-mail traffic in a mobile communications system Grant 6,587,693 - Lumme , et al. July 1, 2 | 2003-07-01 |
| Interception system and method App 20020049913 - Lumme, Martti ; et al. | 2002-04-25 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 