loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Luick; Dean A..The latest application filed is for "graphical program execution with distributed block diagram display".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Graphical programming system with block diagram execution and distributed user interface display Grant 8,533,670 - Dye , et al. September 10, 2 | 2013-09-10 |
Graphical program execution with distributed block diagram display Grant 8,074,203 - Dye , et al. December 6, 2 | 2011-12-06 |
Graphical Program Execution with Distributed Block Diagram Display App 20090024981 - Dye; Robert E. ;   et al. | 2009-01-22 |
Graphical programming system with distributed block diagram execution and front panel display Grant 6,802,053 - Dye , et al. October 5, 2 | 2004-10-05 |
Graphical programming system with block diagram execution and distributed user interface display App 20040158812 - Dye, Robert E. ;   et al. | 2004-08-12 |
Method and apparatus for more efficient function synchronization in a data flow program Grant 5,737,622 - Rogers , et al. April 7, 1 | 1998-04-07 |
Method and apparatus for more efficient function synchronization in a data flow program Grant 5,497,500 - Rogers , et al. March 5, 1 | 1996-03-05 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.