Lui; Chun K.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Lui; Chun K..The latest application filed is for "device for removing an elongated structure implanted in biological tissue".
- Lui; Chun K. - Monroeville PA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Device for removing an elongated structure implanted in biological tissue Grant 7,651,504 - Goode , et al. January 26, 2 | 2010-01-26 |
| Device for removing an elongated structure implanted in biological tissue App 20040153096 - Goode, Louis B. ; et al. | 2004-08-05 |
| Apparatus for removing an elongated structure implanted in biological tissue Grant 6,712,826 - Lui March 30, 2 | 2004-03-30 |
| Apparatus for removing an elongated structure implanted in biological tissue App 20020010475 - Lui, Chun K. | 2002-01-24 |
| Port stabilizer ring Grant 5,620,419 - Lui , et al. April 15, 1 | 1997-04-15 |
| Locally flexible dilator sheath Grant 5,507,751 - Goode , et al. April 16, 1 | 1996-04-16 |
| Valved catheter Grant 5,304,155 - Lui April 19, 1 | 1994-04-19 |
| Valved catheter Grant 5,261,885 - Lui November 16, 1 | 1993-11-16 |
| Fuel assembly stress relieving fastener Grant 4,764,340 - Lui , et al. August 16, 1 | 1988-08-16 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 