Love; Sharon E.

Patent Applications and Registrations

Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Love; Sharon E..The latest application filed is for "method and system for capturing business rules for automated decision procession".

Company Profile

0.12.10

Love; Sharon E. - Blacklick OH
Love; Sharon E. - Austin TX

*profile and listings may contain filings by different individuals or companies with the same name. Review application materials to confirm ownership/assignment.

Patent Activity

Patent	Date
Method and system for capturing business rules for automated decision procession Grant 8,732,107 - Huelsman , et al. May 20, 2	2014-05-20
Rule processing method, apparatus and computer-readable medium to provide improved selection advice Grant 8,055,604 - Huelsman , et al. November 8, 2	2011-11-08
Rule processing system for determining a result response Grant 7,809,669 - Huelsman , et al. October 5, 2	2010-10-05
Method And System For Capturing Business Rules For Automated Decision Procession App 20090313201 - Huelsman; David L. ; et al.	2009-12-17
Rule Processing Method, Apparatus And Computer-readable Medium To Provide Improved Selection Advice App 20090228420 - Huelsman; David L. ; et al.	2009-09-10
Rule processing method, apparatus, and computer-readable medium to generate valid combinations for selection Grant 7,587,380 - Huelsman , et al. September 8, 2	2009-09-08
Method and system for capturing business rules for automated decision procession Grant 7,587,379 - Huelsman , et al. September 8, 2	2009-09-08
Batch validation method, apparatus, and computer-readable medium for rule processing Grant 7,565,337 - Huelsman , et al. July 21, 2	2009-07-21
Rule processing method, apparatus, and computer-readable medium to provide improved selection advice Grant 7,552,102 - Huelsman , et al. June 23, 2	2009-06-23
Rule Processing System App 20080270337 - Huelsman; David L. ; et al.	2008-10-30
Rule processing system Grant 7,430,548 - Huelsman , et al. September 30, 2	2008-09-30
Rule processing system App 20070150429 - Huelsman; David L. ; et al.	2007-06-28
Rule processing system Grant 7,188,091 - Huelsman , et al. March 6, 2	2007-03-06
Method and apparatus using automated rule processing to configure a product or service Grant 7,062,478 - Huelsman , et al. June 13, 2	2006-06-13
Rule processing methods for automating a decision and assessing satisfiability of rule-based decision diagrams Grant 6,965,887 - Huelsman , et al. November 15, 2	2005-11-15
Rule processing method, apparatus, and computer-readable medium to provide improved selection advice App 20050108183 - Huelsman, David L. ; et al.	2005-05-19
Rule processing method, apparatus, and computer-readable medium to generate valid combinations for selection App 20050080648 - Huelsman, David L. ; et al.	2005-04-14
Batch validation method, apparatus, and computer-readable medium for rule processing App 20050080798 - Huelsman, David L. ; et al.	2005-04-14
Method of providing decision automation App 20040260667 - Huelsman, David L. ; et al.	2004-12-23
Method and system for capturing business rules for automated decision procession App 20040181500 - Huelsman, David L. ; et al.	2004-09-16
Rule processing system App 20030220926 - Huelsman, David L. ; et al.	2003-11-27

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.