Lofstrom; Keith
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Lofstrom; Keith.The latest application filed is for "system and method for providing an integrated circuit with a unique identification".
- Lofstrom; Keith - Beaverton OR
- Lofstrom; Keith - Hillsboro OR
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| System and method for providing an integrated circuit with a unique identification Grant RE40,188 - Lofstrom March 25, 2 | 2008-03-25 |
| Database system using a record key having some randomly positioned, non-deterministic bits Grant 6,738,788 - Horng , et al. May 18, 2 | 2004-05-18 |
| System for providing an integrated circuit with a unique identification Grant 6,161,213 - Lofstrom December 12, 2 | 2000-12-12 |
| Input/output (I/O) bidirectional buffer for interfacing I/O ports of a field programmable interconnection device with array ports of a cross-point switch Grant 5,428,800 - Hsieh , et al. June 27, 1 | 1995-06-27 |
| I/O buffering system to a programmable switching apparatus Grant 5,282,271 - Hsieh , et al. January 25, 1 | 1994-01-25 |
| Bi-directional bus repeater Grant 5,202,593 - Huang , et al. April 13, 1 | 1993-04-13 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 