Loevstedt; Hans Fredrik
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Loevstedt; Hans Fredrik.The latest application filed is for "compliance verification system".
- Loevstedt; Hans Fredrik - Palo Alto CA
- - Palo Alto CA US
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Compliance Verification System App 20220166800 - Blitz; Ebba Ulrika Margareta ; et al. | 2022-05-26 |
| Compliance Verification System App 20210281611 - Blitz; Ebba Ulrika Margareta ; et al. | 2021-09-09 |
| Independent encryption compliance verification system Grant 11,050,790 - Blitz , et al. June 29, 2 | 2021-06-29 |
| Encryption compliance verification system Grant 10,860,723 - Blitz , et al. December 8, 2 | 2020-12-08 |
| Independent Encryption Compliance Verification System App 20200344263 - Blitz; Ebba Ulrika Margareta ; et al. | 2020-10-29 |
| Encryption compliance verification system Grant 10,652,279 - Blitz , et al. | 2020-05-12 |
| Independent Encryption Compliance Verification System App 20190190958 - Blitz; Ebba Ulrika Margareta ; et al. | 2019-06-20 |
| Encryption compliance verification system Grant 10250643 - | 2019-04-02 |
| Encryption compliance verification system Grant 10248794 - | 2019-04-02 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 