Lo; Chet
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Lo; Chet.The latest application filed is for "non-contact reflectometry system and method".
- Lo; Chet - Salt Lake City UT
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Non-contact reflectometry system and method Grant 7,622,931 - Wu , et al. November 24, 2 | 2009-11-24 |
| Wire network mapping method and apparatus using impulse responses Grant 7,282,922 - Lo , et al. October 16, 2 | 2007-10-16 |
| Method and system for testing a signal path having an operational signal Grant 7,271,596 - Furse , et al. September 18, 2 | 2007-09-18 |
| Apparatus and method for testing a signal path from an injection point Grant 7,215,126 - Furse , et al. May 8, 2 | 2007-05-08 |
| Non-contact reflectometry system and method App 20070085550 - Wu; Shang ; et al. | 2007-04-19 |
| Wire network mapping method and apparatus using impulse responses App 20060182269 - Lo; Chet ; et al. | 2006-08-17 |
| Apparatus and method for testing a signal path from an injection point App 20060087323 - Furse; Cynthia ; et al. | 2006-04-27 |
| Method and system for testing a signal path having an operational signal App 20060039322 - Furse; Cynthia ; et al. | 2006-02-23 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 