Liu, Jianxiang
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Liu, Jianxiang. Liu, Jianxiang has 2 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "COVE YD"
- Company Aliases
- Jianxiang Liu
- Liu, Jianxiang
- jianxiang liu
- Liu; Jianxiang - Beijing CN
- LIU; Jianxiang - Wuhan CN
- Liu; Jianxiang - Wuhan CN
| Entity Type | INDIVIDUAL |
| Address | No.639, Shagetuo Village Shagetuo Town, Hunyuan County Datong, Shanxi CHINA 037400 |
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| ARTIFICIAL DISC 20120095562 - 13/376108 Cheng; Cheng-kung ; et al. | 2012-04-19 |
| ACTIVE PEPTIDE OF BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN-2, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME AND THE APPLICATION 20090082272 - 12/099869 GUO; Xiaodong ; et al. | 2009-03-26 |
| Artificial disc 8,974,529 - 13/376,108 Cheng , et al. March 10, 2 | 2015-03-10 |
| Artificial disc 8,974,529 - 13/376,108 Cheng , et al. March 10, 2 | 2015-03-10 |
| Bioactive peptide of bone morphogenetic protein-2 7,754,683 - 12/099,869 Guo , et al. July 13, 2 | 2010-07-13 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
"COVE YD" 97045614 |
COVE YD 2021-09-26 |
"LAVLIOD" 5620407 87674551 |
LAVLIOD 2017-11-07 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 