loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Litch; Andrew David.The latest application filed is for "gasket and flange design on a refrigerator for better energy efficiency".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Condenser assembly system for an appliance Grant 9,791,221 - Litch October 17, 2 | 2017-10-17 |
Gasket and flange design on a refrigerator for better energy efficiency Grant 9,062,480 - Litch June 23, 2 | 2015-06-23 |
Gasket And Flange Design On A Refrigerator For Better Energy Efficiency App 20140047775 - LITCH; ANDREW DAVID | 2014-02-20 |
Extended cold (battery backup) refrigerator Grant 8,033,134 - Litch , et al. October 11, 2 | 2011-10-11 |
Extended Cold (battery Backup) Refrigerator App 20090045680 - Litch; Andrew David ;   et al. | 2009-02-19 |
Hybrid window/split air treatment appliance Grant 6,983,621 - Cur , et al. January 10, 2 | 2006-01-10 |
Hybrid window/split air treatment appliance App 20030110789 - Cur, Nihat O. ;   et al. | 2003-06-19 |
Hybrid Window/split Air Treatment Appliance App 20030097854 - Cur, Nihat O. ;   et al. | 2003-05-29 |
Hybrid window/split air treatment appliance Grant 6,568,201 - Cur , et al. May 27, 2 | 2003-05-27 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.