Lindemann; Hans-Joachim
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Lindemann; Hans-Joachim.The latest application filed is for "insufflator".
- Lindemann; Hans-Joachim - 2 Hamburg 6 DT
- Lindemann; Hans-Joachim - 2 Hamburg 13 DT
- Lindemann; Hans-Joachim - 2000 Hamburg 6 DT
- Lindemann; Hans-Joachim - Hamburg DT
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Insufflator Grant 4,048,992 - Lindemann , et al. September 20, 1 | 1977-09-20 |
| Medical dilator Grant 4,013,079 - Lindemann , et al. March 22, 1 | 1977-03-22 |
| Insufflation Apparatus For Introducing Limited Quantities Of Carbon Dioxide Into The Human Body For Operative Purposes Grant 3,870,072 - Lindemann March 11, 1 | 1975-03-11 |
| Insufflation Apparatus For Introducing Limited Quantities Of Carbon Dioxide Into The Human Body For Operative Purposes Grant 3,867,941 - Lindemann February 25, 1 | 1975-02-25 |
| Electrocoagulation-bougie For The Intrauterine Tube Sterilization Grant 3,840,016 - Lindemann October 8, 1 | 1974-10-08 |
| Electrocoagulation Grasping Forceps For Tube Sterilization By Means Of Bipolar High Frequency Heat Radiation Grant 3,831,607 - Lindemann August 27, 1 | 1974-08-27 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 