Limelight Networks Inc
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Limelight Networks Inc. Limelight Networks Inc has 12 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "LIMELIGHT ORCHESTRATE"
- Company Aliases
- Limelight Networks, Inc.
- Limelight Networks, Inc. - Tempe AZ US
- Limelight Networks, Inc. - Scottsdale AZ US
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| UNIFIED ROUTING AND CACHING LOGIC FOR APPLICATIONS UTILIZING A CONTENT DELIVERY NETWORK 20220295117 - 17/693306 Brocato; Mark ; et al. | 2022-09-15 |
| SPLIT TESTING WITH CUSTOM CACHE KEYS FOR CONTENT DELIVERY NETWORKS 20220294866 - 17/693307 Brocato; Mark ; et al. | 2022-09-15 |
| AUTOMATED CONFIGURATION OF A CONTENT DELIVERY NETWORK 20220294689 - 17/693304 Brocato; Mark ; et al. | 2022-09-15 |
| END-TO-END ACCELERATION OF DYNAMIC CONTENT 20200274807 - 16/872266 Hofmann; Jason | 2020-08-27 |
| END-TO-END ACCELERATION OF DYNAMIC CONTENT 20190104068 - 16/150209 Hofmann; Jason | 2019-04-04 |
| NCAGE Code | 53GJ2 | LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC.!DBA LIMELIGHT NETWORKS |
| CAGE Code | 53GJ2 | LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC. LIMELIGHT NETWORKS |
| SEC | 0001391127 | Limelight Networks, Inc. of DELAWARE |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 