Lim; Young-Won
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Lim; Young-Won.The latest application filed is for "key scheduler for encryption apparatus using data encryption standard algorithm".
- Lim; Young-Won - Ichon-shi KR
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Key scheduler for encryption apparatus using data encryption standard algorithm Grant 7,123,720 - Lim October 17, 2 | 2006-10-17 |
| Encryption apparatus using data encryption standard algorithm Grant 7,099,470 - Lim August 29, 2 | 2006-08-29 |
| Encryption device using data encryption standard algorithm Grant 6,931,127 - Lim August 16, 2 | 2005-08-16 |
| Encryption apparatus using data encryption standard algorithm Grant 6,914,984 - Lim July 5, 2 | 2005-07-05 |
| Key scheduler for encryption apparatus using data encryption standard algorithm App 20020018562 - Lim, Young-Won | 2002-02-14 |
| Encryption apparatus using data encryption standard algorithm App 20020012430 - Lim, Young-Won | 2002-01-31 |
| Encryption device using data encryption standard algorithm App 20020009196 - Lim, Young-Won | 2002-01-24 |
| Encryption apparatus using data encryption standard algorithm App 20020003876 - Lim, Young-Won | 2002-01-10 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 