Lim; Swee Boon

Patent Applications and Registrations

Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Lim; Swee Boon.The latest application filed is for "systems and methods for software dependency management".

Company Profile

0.19.2

Lim; Swee Boon - Cupertino CA
Lim; Swee Boon - Mountain View CA
Lim; Swee Boon - Palo Alto CA
Lim; Swee Boon - Moutain View CA

*profile and listings may contain filings by different individuals or companies with the same name. Review application materials to confirm ownership/assignment.

Patent Activity

Patent	Date
Systems and methods for software dependency management Grant 9,348,582 - Pillgram-Larsen , et al. May 24, 2	2016-05-24
Systems And Methods For Software Dependency Management App 20150227363 - Pillgram-Larsen; Jens ; et al.	2015-08-13
Method and system for type identification for multiple object interfaces in a distributed object environment Grant 6,941,556 - Kessler , et al. September 6, 2	2005-09-06
Method and apparatus for recovering from failure of a mirrored boot device Grant 6,785,838 - Lim , et al. August 31, 2	2004-08-31
Method and apparatus for improving the performance of object invocation Grant 6,718,550 - Lim , et al. April 6, 2	2004-04-06
Method and apparatus for recovering from failure of a mirrored boot device App 20020112198 - Lim, Swee Boon ; et al.	2002-08-15
Load balancing in a network environment Grant 6,327,622 - Jindal , et al. December 4, 2	2001-12-04
Load balancing for replicated services Grant 6,324,580 - Jindal , et al. November 27, 2	2001-11-27
Framework for marshaling and unmarshaling argument object references Grant 6,272,557 - Lim , et al. August 7, 2	2001-08-07
Mechanism for invoking and servicing multiplexed messages with low context switching overhead Grant 6,212,573 - Lim , et al. April 3, 2	2001-04-03
Mechanism for dispatching requests in a distributed object system Grant 6,189,048 - Lim , et al. February 13, 2	2001-02-13
System for responding to a resource request Grant 6,092,178 - Jindal , et al. July 18, 2	2000-07-18
Framework for marshaling and unmarshaling argument object references Grant 6,044,409 - Lim , et al. March 28, 2	2000-03-28
Mechanism for dynamically associating a service dependent representation with objects at run time Grant 6,044,224 - Radia , et al. March 28, 2	2000-03-28
Transport independent invocation and servant interfaces that permit both typecode interpreted and compiled marshaling Grant 6,032,199 - Lim , et al. February 29, 2	2000-02-29
Low overhead object adaptor Grant 5,991,823 - Cavanaugh, III , et al. November 23, 1	1999-11-23
Load balancing and failover of network services Grant 5,938,732 - Lim , et al. August 17, 1	1999-08-17
Method and apparatus for dynamic packet filter assignment Grant 5,848,233 - Radia , et al. December 8, 1	1998-12-08
Method and apparatus for controlling access to services within a computer network Grant 5,835,727 - Wong , et al. November 10, 1	1998-11-10
Compiler with generic front end and dynamically loadable back ends Grant 5,812,851 - Levy , et al. September 22, 1	1998-09-22
Method and apparatus for allowing generic stubs to marshal and unmarshal data in object reference specific data formats Grant 5,737,607 - Hamilton , et al. April 7, 1	1998-04-07

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.