Lifton; Victor Alexander
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Lifton; Victor Alexander.The latest application filed is for "structured membrane with controllable permeability".
- Lifton; Victor Alexander - Bridgewater NJ
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Structured membrane with controllable permeability Grant 7,695,550 - Krupenkin , et al. April 13, 2 | 2010-04-13 |
| Method for attaching chips in a flip-chip arrangement Grant 7,573,723 - Lifton , et al. August 11, 2 | 2009-08-11 |
| Structured Membrane With Controllable Permeability App 20060255171 - Krupenkin; Thomas Nikita ; et al. | 2006-11-16 |
| Micromirror having counterbalancing structures and method for manufacturing same Grant 6,846,087 - Carr , et al. January 25, 2 | 2005-01-25 |
| Ultrathin charge dissipation coatings App 20040185284 - Ho, Peter Kian-Hoon ; et al. | 2004-09-23 |
| Method for attaching chips in a flip-chip arrangement App 20040165363 - Lifton, Victor Alexander ; et al. | 2004-08-26 |
| Micromirror having counterbalancing structures and method for manufacturing same App 20040021963 - Carr, Dustin W. ; et al. | 2004-02-05 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 