loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Liang; Huimin.The latest application filed is for "high-power bi-directional non-recovery spring magnetic valve comprising permanent magnet".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
High-power bi-directional non-recovery spring magnetic valve comprising permanent magnet Grant 9,890,871 - Liang , et al. February 13, 2 | 2018-02-13 |
Structure electromagnetic relay containing permanent magnet Grant 9,697,973 - Liang , et al. July 4, 2 | 2017-07-04 |
Electromagnetic structure comprising a permanent magnet Grant 9,607,796 - Liang , et al. March 28, 2 | 2017-03-28 |
High-power Bi-directional Non-recovery Spring Magnetic Valve Comprising Permanent Magnet App 20170074418 - LIANG; Huimin ;   et al. | 2017-03-16 |
Electromagnetic Structure Comprising Permanent Magnets App 20160172137 - LIANG; Huimin ;   et al. | 2016-06-16 |
Novel-structure Electromagnetic Relay Containing Permanent Magnet App 20150303017 - LIANG; Huimin ;   et al. | 2015-10-22 |
Myocardial peptide, preparation method and uses thereof Grant 8,940,865 - Chen , et al. January 27, 2 | 2015-01-27 |
Myocardial Peptide, Preparation Method And Uses Thereof App 20110160432 - Chen; Yusong ;   et al. | 2011-06-30 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.