Lian; Yajing
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Lian; Yajing.The latest application filed is for "glp-1 receptor agonists and uses thereof".
- Lian; Yajing - Waterford CT
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Anti-proliferative agents for treating PAH Grant 11,203,594 - Bhattacharya , et al. December 21, 2 | 2021-12-21 |
| GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Uses Thereof App 20210163455 - Aspnes; Gary Erik ; et al. | 2021-06-03 |
| GLP-1 receptor agonists and uses thereof Grant 10,934,279 - Aspnes , et al. March 2, 2 | 2021-03-02 |
| Anti-proliferative Agents For Treating Pah App 20200331909 - Bhattacharya; Samit Kumar ; et al. | 2020-10-22 |
| GLP-1 receptor agonists and uses thereof Grant 10,683,281 - Aspnes , et al. | 2020-06-16 |
| GLP-1 receptor agonists and uses thereof Grant 10,676,465 - Aspnes , et al. | 2020-06-09 |
| GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Uses Thereof App 20190382388 - Aspnes; Gary Erik ; et al. | 2019-12-19 |
| GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Uses Thereof App 20190382387 - Aspnes; Gary Erik ; et al. | 2019-12-19 |
| GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Uses Thereof App 20190382384 - Aspnes; Gary Erik ; et al. | 2019-12-19 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 