Trademark applications and grants for Shenghui Li. Shenghui Li has 1 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "SEFILKO"
Entity Type | INDIVIDUAL |
Address | No. 10, Gaoxin South, Nanshan District Shenzhen CHINA 518057 |
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
METHOD AND SYSTEM TO DETERMINE BIOMARKERS RELATED TO ABNORMAL CONDITION 20150376697 - 13/640448 Li; Shenghui ;   et al. | 2015-12-31 |
Biomarkers for Diabetes and Usages Thereof 20150292011 - 14/418800 Li; Shenghui ;   et al. | 2015-10-15 |
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR ANALYZING MICROBIAL COMMUNITY COMPOSITION 20150242565 - 14/419060 Li; Shenghui ;   et al. | 2015-08-27 |
BIOMARKERS FOR DIABETES AND USAGES THEREOF 20150211053 - 13/639781 Li; Shenghui ;   et al. | 2015-07-30 |
USE OF ROSEBURIA IN THE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT FOR OBESITY RELATED DISEASES 20150037286 - 14/516373 Qin; Junjie ;   et al. | 2015-02-05 |
Biomarkers for diabetes and usages thereof 10,100,360 - 14/418,800 Li , et al. October 16, 2 | 2018-10-16 |
Wall mounted split room air conditioner D709,604 - D/438,065 Qin , et al. July 22, 2 | 2014-07-22 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
---|---|
![]() "SEFILKO" 5961263 88502608 |
SEFILKO 2019-07-07 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.