loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Leibovitz; Anthony M..The latest application filed is for "extensible access control architecture".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Extensible access control architecture Grant 9,521,119 - Leibovitz , et al. December 13, 2 | 2016-12-13 |
Extensible Access Control Architecture App 20160036781 - Leibovitz; Anthony M. ;   et al. | 2016-02-04 |
Extensible access control architecture Grant 9,185,091 - Leibovitz , et al. November 10, 2 | 2015-11-10 |
Extensible Access Control Architecture App 20130024911 - Leibovitz; Anthony M. ;   et al. | 2013-01-24 |
Extensible access control architecture Grant 8,286,223 - Leibovitz , et al. October 9, 2 | 2012-10-09 |
Extensible access control architecture App 20070016939 - Leibovitz; Anthony M. ;   et al. | 2007-01-18 |
System uses test controller to match different combination configuration capabilities of servers and clients and assign test cases for implementing distributed testing Grant 6,804,709 - Manjure , et al. October 12, 2 | 2004-10-12 |
Distributed testing of an implementation of a remote access protocol App 20020116507 - Manjure, Samir B. ;   et al. | 2002-08-22 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.