loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Leibholz; Daniel.The latest application filed is for "architectural reuse of registers for out of order simultaneous multi-threading".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Versatile register file design for a multi-threaded processor utilizing different modes and register windows Grant 7,418,582 - Iacobovici , et al. August 26, 2 | 2008-08-26 |
Microprocessor And Method For Giving Each Thread Exclusive Access To One Register File In A Multi-threading Mode And For Giving An Active Thread Access To Multiple Register Files In A Single Thread Mode Grant 6,954,846 - Leibholz , et al. October 11, 2 | 2005-10-11 |
Architectural reuse of registers for out of order simultaneous multi-threading App 20030033509 - Leibholz, Daniel ;   et al. | 2003-02-13 |
Scoreboard for scheduling of instructions in a microprocessor that provides out of order execution App 20020138714 - Leibholz, Daniel ;   et al. | 2002-09-26 |
Hardware spill/fill engine for register windows App 20020083309 - Leibholz, Daniel ;   et al. | 2002-06-27 |
Method of dynamically allocating processors in a massively parallel processing system Grant 5,103,393 - Harris , et al. April 7, 1 | 1992-04-07 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.