Lee; Thomas Anthony
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Lee; Thomas Anthony.The latest application filed is for "wireless phone-interface device".
- Lee; Thomas Anthony - Lakeville MN
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Integrated circuit having data transceivers and method of positioning circuits on an integrated circuit Grant 7,958,294 - Lee June 7, 2 | 2011-06-07 |
| Integrated circuit and method of generating a bias current for a plurality of data transceivers Grant 7,558,552 - Lee July 7, 2 | 2009-07-07 |
| Integrated circuit and method of routing a clock signal in an integrated circuit Grant 7,536,666 - Lee , et al. May 19, 2 | 2009-05-19 |
| Wireless phone-interface device Grant 7,248,157 - Bergman , et al. July 24, 2 | 2007-07-24 |
| Radio frequency data conveyance system including configurable integrated circuits Grant 7,184,466 - Seemann , et al. February 27, 2 | 2007-02-27 |
| Wireless phone-interface device Grant 7,054,414 - Bergman , et al. May 30, 2 | 2006-05-30 |
| Wireless phone-interface device App 20020163997 - Bergman, John Todd ; et al. | 2002-11-07 |
| Wireless phone-interface device App 20020163430 - Bergman, John Todd ; et al. | 2002-11-07 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 