Ledbetter; Matthew Curtis
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Ledbetter; Matthew Curtis.The latest application filed is for "absolute and relative importance trend detection".
- Ledbetter; Matthew Curtis - North Richland Hills TX
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Droop ring with removable wear elements Grant 11,235,870 - Wiinikka , et al. February 1, 2 | 2022-02-01 |
| Absolute And Relative Importance Trend Detection App 20210406742 - LEDBETTER; Matthew Curtis ; et al. | 2021-12-30 |
| Automated Trend Detection App 20210055717 - TUCKER; Brian Edward ; et al. | 2021-02-25 |
| Rotorcraft centrifugal force bearing Grant 10,864,985 - McCullough , et al. December 15, 2 | 2020-12-15 |
| System and method for adaptable trend detection for component condition indicator data Grant 10,657,735 - Tucker , et al. | 2020-05-19 |
| Droop Ring with Removable Wear Elements App 20200001991 - Wiinikka; Mark Adam ; et al. | 2020-01-02 |
| System and Method for Adaptable Trend Detection for Component Condition Indicator Data App 20190108691 - Tucker; Brian Edward ; et al. | 2019-04-11 |
| Rotorcraft Centrifugal Force Bearing App 20190031328 - McCullough; John ; et al. | 2019-01-31 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 