Leber; Matthias
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Leber; Matthias.The latest application filed is for "device and method for determining the oscillatory behavior of a brake lining in the field of motor vehicles".
- Leber; Matthias - Stuttgart DE
- Leber; Matthias - D-71059 Sindelfingen DE
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Device and method for determining the oscillatory behavior of a brake lining in the field of motor vehicles Grant 8,528,392 - Thomas , et al. September 10, 2 | 2013-09-10 |
| Device And Method For Determining The Oscillatory Behavior Of A Brake Lining In The Field Of Motor Vehicles App 20110239741 - Thomas; Claus ; et al. | 2011-10-06 |
| Piston for cylinder and piston unit of disc brake Grant 7,156,212 - Ciotti , et al. January 2, 2 | 2007-01-02 |
| Method for determining a brake state Grant 7,011,186 - Frentz , et al. March 14, 2 | 2006-03-14 |
| Method for determining a brake state App 20040195050 - Frentz, Georg ; et al. | 2004-10-07 |
| Method and brake system for modifying and adjusting the braking force in a vehicle App 20040155523 - Frentz, Georg ; et al. | 2004-08-12 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 