Lavery; Aidan Joseph
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Lavery; Aidan Joseph.The latest application filed is for "ink-jet recording sheet with improved ozone resistance".
- Lavery; Aidan Joseph - Aylesbury GB
- Lavery; Aidan Joseph - Buckinghamshire GB
- Lavery; Aidan Joseph - High Wycombe GB
- Lavery; Aidan Joseph - Manchester GB
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Ink-jet recording sheet with improved ozone resistance Grant 6,926,936 - Barcock , et al. August 9, 2 | 2005-08-09 |
| Ink-jet recording sheet with improved ozone resistance App 20030219611 - Barcock, Richard A. ; et al. | 2003-11-27 |
| Porous ink-jet recording material App 20030152721 - Barcock, Richard Anthony ; et al. | 2003-08-14 |
| Composition containing two different disazodyestuffs useful for ink jet recording Grant 6,551,390 - Lavery , et al. April 22, 2 | 2003-04-22 |
| Inkjet recording material having improved light fastness App 20030049419 - Barcock, Richard Anthony ; et al. | 2003-03-13 |
| Ink-jet printing process using polymeric biguanides Grant 6,485,139 - Lavery , et al. November 26, 2 | 2002-11-26 |
| Dye compositions Grant 6,231,653 - Lavery , et al. May 15, 2 | 2001-05-15 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 