Laurenti; Gilbert
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Laurenti; Gilbert.The latest application filed is for "recording processor instruction execution cycle and non-cycle count trace events".
- Laurenti; Gilbert - St. Paul FR
- Laurenti; Gilbert - Saint Paul de Vence FR
- Laurenti; Gilbert - Saint Paul FR
- Laurenti; Gilbert - St. Paul de Vence FR
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Recording Processor Instruction Execution Cycle And Non-cycle Count Trace Events App 20200233771 - Laurenti; Gilbert | 2020-07-23 |
| Recording processor instruction execution cycle and non-cycle count trace events Grant 10,649,878 - Laurenti | 2020-05-12 |
| Recording Processor Instruction Execution Cycle And Non-cycle Count Trace Events App 20150089301 - Laurenti; Gilbert | 2015-03-26 |
| Sliding granularity time stamping Grant 8,307,344 - Laurenti , et al. November 6, 2 | 2012-11-06 |
| Power management events profiling Grant 8,190,931 - Laurenti , et al. May 29, 2 | 2012-05-29 |
| Mixed Mode Processor Tracing App 20120042212 - Laurenti; Gilbert | 2012-02-16 |
| Power Management Events Profiling App 20100281309 - Laurenti; Gilbert ; et al. | 2010-11-04 |
| Sliding Granularity Time Stamping App 20090204951 - LAURENTI; Gilbert ; et al. | 2009-08-13 |
| Dynamic frequency scaling for JTAG communication Grant 7,509,549 - Larson , et al. March 24, 2 | 2009-03-24 |
| Dynamic Frequency Scaling For Jtag Communication App 20080163017 - Larson; Lee ; et al. | 2008-07-03 |
| Processor with a computer repeat instruction Grant 6,990,570 - Masse , et al. January 24, 2 | 2006-01-24 |
| Processor with pointer tracking to eliminate redundant memory fetches Grant 6,826,679 - Laurenti , et al. November 30, 2 | 2004-11-30 |
| Microprocessor with selected partitions disabled during block repeat Grant 6,795,930 - Laurenti , et al. September 21, 2 | 2004-09-21 |
| Bit field processor Grant 6,760,837 - Laurenti , et al. July 6, 2 | 2004-07-06 |
| Preventing the execution of a set of instructions in parallel based on an indication that the instructions were erroneously pre-coded for parallel execution Grant 6,742,110 - Djafarian , et al. May 25, 2 | 2004-05-25 |
| Dual access instruction and compound memory access instruction with compatible address fields Grant 6,681,319 - Djafarian , et al. January 20, 2 | 2004-01-20 |
| Microprocessors Grant 6,658,578 - Laurenti , et al. December 2, 2 | 2003-12-02 |
| Stack Pointer Management Grant 6,598,151 - Laurenti , et al. July 22, 2 | 2003-07-22 |
| Processor With A Computer Repeat Instruction App 20030093656 - MASSE, YVES ; et al. | 2003-05-15 |
| Linear vector computation Grant 6,557,097 - Clave , et al. April 29, 2 | 2003-04-29 |
| A Processor With Apparatus For Verifying Instruction Parallelism App 20030074543 - Djafarian, Karim ; et al. | 2003-04-17 |
| Trace fifo management Grant 6,507,921 - Buser , et al. January 14, 2 | 2003-01-14 |
| Dual interrupt vector mapping Grant 6,502,152 - Laurenti December 31, 2 | 2002-12-31 |
| Processor with instruction qualifiers to control MMU operation Grant 6,499,098 - Laurenti December 24, 2 | 2002-12-24 |
| Circular buffer management Grant 6,363,470 - Laurenti , et al. March 26, 2 | 2002-03-26 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 