Larsen; Robert E.

Patent Applications and Registrations

Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Larsen; Robert E..The latest application filed is for "non-volatile configuration data storage for a configurable memory".

Company Profile

0.19.1

Larsen; Robert E. - Placerville CA
Larsen; Robert E. - Shingle Springs CA
Larsen; Robert E. - Santa Clara CA

*profile and listings may contain filings by different individuals or companies with the same name. Review application materials to confirm ownership/assignment.

Patent Activity

Patent	Date
Non-volatile configuration data storage for a configurable memory Grant 7,386,654 - Dover , et al. June 10, 2	2008-06-10
Non-volatile configuration data storage for a configurable memory App 20060083093 - Dover; Lance W. ; et al.	2006-04-20
Self-configuring input buffer on flash memories Grant 6,628,552 - Larsen , et al. September 30, 2	2003-09-30
Read-while-write memory including fewer verify sense amplifiers than read sense amplifiers Grant 6,260,103 - Alexis , et al. July 10, 2	2001-07-10
Method and apparatus for preventing the fraudulent use of a cellular telephone Grant 6,223,290 - Larsen , et al. April 24, 2	2001-04-24
Method and apparatus for placing a memory in a read-while-write mode Grant 6,182,189 - Alexis , et al. January 30, 2	2001-01-30
Apparatus and method using volatile lock and lock-down registers and for protecting memory blocks Grant 6,154,819 - Larsen , et al. November 28, 2	2000-11-28
Method and apparatus for fast production programming and low-voltage in-system writes for programmable logic device Grant 6,150,835 - Hazen , et al. November 21, 2	2000-11-21
Flash memory partitioning for read-while-write operation Grant 6,088,264 - Hazen , et al. July 11, 2	2000-07-11
1.8 volt output buffer on flash memories Grant 5,903,500 - Tsang , et al. May 11, 1	1999-05-11
Method and apparatus for sequential programming of the bits in a word of a flash EEPROM memory array Grant 5,537,350 - Larsen , et al. July 16, 1	1996-07-16
Method and apparatus for controlling the output current provided by a charge pump circuit Grant 5,455,794 - Javanifard , et al. October 3, 1	1995-10-03
Method and apparatus for controlling the output current provided by a charge pump circuit Grant 5,442,586 - Javanifard , et al. August 15, 1	1995-08-15
Method and apparatus for programming and erasing flash EEPROM memory arrays utilizing a charge pump circuit Grant 5,414,669 - Tedrow , et al. May 9, 1	1995-05-09
Method and apparatus for testing the continuity of static random access memory cells Grant 5,255,230 - Chan , et al. October 19, 1	1993-10-19
Port expander architecture for mapping a first set of addresses to external memory and mapping a second set of addresses to an I/O port Grant 5,243,700 - Larsen , et al. September 7, 1	1993-09-07
Burst EPROM architecture Grant 5,159,672 - Salmon , et al. October 27, 1	1992-10-27
Test mode enable scheme for memory Grant 5,077,738 - Larsen , et al. December 31, 1	1991-12-31
CMOS output circuit using a low threshold device Grant 5,057,715 - Larsen , et al. October 15, 1	1991-10-15
Method Of Making Magnetic Recording Discs Grant 3,622,386 - Larsen November 23, 1	1971-11-23

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.