loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Lapeyre; Didier.The latest application filed is for "mechanical prosthetic heart valve".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Mechanical prosthetic heart valve Grant 10,182,907 - Lapeyre Ja | 2019-01-22 |
Mechanical Prosthetic Heart Valve App 20100131056 - Lapeyre; Didier | 2010-05-27 |
Mechanical heart valve App 20080086202 - Lapeyre; Didier | 2008-04-10 |
Mechanical heart valve App 20020183840 - Lapeyre, Didier ;   et al. | 2002-12-05 |
Mechanical valve prosthesis with optimized closing mode Grant 6,068,657 - Lapeyre , et al. May 30, 2 | 2000-05-30 |
Prosthetic heart valve Grant 5,123,918 - Perrier , et al. June 23, 1 | 1992-06-23 |
Total heat prosthesis Grant 5,089,018 - Lapeyre , et al. February 18, 1 | 1992-02-18 |
Device for atraumatic access to the blood circuit Grant 4,654,033 - Lapeyre , et al. March 31, 1 | 1987-03-31 |
Apparatus and process for very rapidly measuring the heart beat rate Grant 4,624,262 - Berger , et al. November 25, 1 | 1986-11-25 |
Total cardiac prosthesis Grant 4,588,404 - Lapeyre | 1986-05-13 |
Human artificial heart Grant D273,989 - Lapeyre May 22, 1 | 1984-05-22 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.