Landstorfer; Friedrich
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Landstorfer; Friedrich.The latest application filed is for "planar antenna and antenna system".
- Landstorfer; Friedrich - Stuttgart DE
- Landstorfer; Friedrich - Munich DE
- Landstorfer; Friedrich - Munich 60 DE
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Planar antenna and antenna system Grant 7,030,827 - Mahler , et al. April 18, 2 | 2006-04-18 |
| Planar antenna and antenna system App 20050184920 - Mahler, Wolfgang ; et al. | 2005-08-25 |
| Device including plural wire detecting coils having faulty coil sensing capabilities for the directional guidance of the trackless vehicle Grant 4,665,369 - Faller , et al. May 12, 1 | 1987-05-12 |
| Tissue coagulation apparatus and method Grant 4,209,018 - Meinke , et al. June 24, 1 | 1980-06-24 |
| Safety circuitry for high frequency cutting and coagulating devices Grant 4,184,492 - Meinke , et al. January 22, 1 | 1980-01-22 |
| Cutting and coagulation apparatus for surgery Grant 4,114,623 - Meinke , et al. September 19, 1 | 1978-09-19 |
| Windshield antenna defroster combination with radio interference reduction Grant 4,095,228 - Meinke , et al. June 13, 1 | 1978-06-13 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 