loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Lancaster; James W..The latest application filed is for "height of cut adjustment system for mower cutting deck".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Mower cutting deck having a height of cut adjustment system with deck suspension linkages that each have an easily acessible threaded adjuster for deck truing or rake angle setting purposes Grant 9,003,751 - Lancaster April 14, 2 | 2015-04-14 |
Height of cut adjustment system for mower cutting deck Grant 8,919,087 - Lancaster December 30, 2 | 2014-12-30 |
Height Of Cut Adjustment System For Mower Cutting Deck App 20140260161 - Lancaster; James W. | 2014-09-18 |
Height Of Cut Adjustment System For Mower Cutting Deck App 20140260162 - Lancaster; James W. | 2014-09-18 |
Height of cut adjustment system for mower cutting deck Grant 8,438,822 - Lancaster May 14, 2 | 2013-05-14 |
Height of cut adjustment system for mower cutting desk App 20090183481 - Lancaster; James W. ;   et al. | 2009-07-23 |
Front rotary cutting deck having folded service/storage positions Grant 7,451,586 - Papke , et al. November 18, 2 | 2008-11-18 |
Non-interrupting gas meter exchange system Grant 4,327,760 - Lancaster May 4, 1 | 1982-05-04 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.