Lake Center Industries
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Lake Center Industries.The latest application filed is for "solid-state electronic brush speed sensing control".
- Lake Center Industries - Winona MN
Trademarks
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Solid-state electronic brush speed sensing control Grant 4,398,231 - Currence August 9, 1 | 1983-08-09 |
| Electronic variable speed automotive blower control system Grant 4,347,468 - Wilke August 31, 1 | 1982-08-31 |
| Brush speed sensing control for vacuum cleaner Grant 4,328,522 - Tryan May 4, 1 | 1982-05-04 |
| Door lock actuator Grant 4,270,783 - Sorensen , et al. June 2, 1 | 1981-06-02 |
| Coffee maker with steam flushing cycle Grant 4,083,295 - Hollingsworth April 11, 1 | 1978-04-11 |
| Pressure sensitive matrix switch having apertured spacer with flexible double sided adhesive intermediate and channels optionally interposed between apertures Grant 4,065,649 - Carter , et al. December 27, 1 | 1977-12-27 |
| Counting device Grant 4,054,779 - Wilke October 18, 1 | 1977-10-18 |
| Method of making heating device for liquids Grant 3,953,923 - Rygmyr May 4, 1 | 1976-05-04 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 