loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Laharty; Christopher Jon.The latest application filed is for "printhead having two adhesives".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Printhead having two adhesives Grant 10,710,367 - Rao , et al. | 2020-07-14 |
Printhead Having Two Adhesives App 20190240977 - Rao; Pratima Gattu Naga ;   et al. | 2019-08-08 |
Printhead having two adhesives Grant 10,322,583 - Rao , et al. | 2019-06-18 |
Printhead Having Two Adhesives App 20160332445 - Rao; Pratima Gattu Naga ;   et al. | 2016-11-17 |
Printhead having two adhesives Grant 9,427,969 - Rao , et al. August 30, 2 | 2016-08-30 |
Printhead Having Two Adhesives App 20150158298 - Rao; Pratima Gattu Naga ;   et al. | 2015-06-11 |
Heat element configuration for a reservoir heater Grant 8,550,611 - Alavizadeh , et al. October 8, 2 | 2013-10-08 |
Heat Element Configuration for A Reservoir Heater App 20120113196 - Alavizadeh; Nasser ;   et al. | 2012-05-10 |
Heat element configuration for a reservoir heater Grant 8,092,000 - Alavizadeh , et al. January 10, 2 | 2012-01-10 |
Heat Element Configuration for A Reservoir Heater App 20100182386 - Alavizadeh; Nasser ;   et al. | 2010-07-22 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.