loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Laakmann; Katherine D..The latest application filed is for "lightpipe tip for contact laser surgery".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Lightpipe tip for contact laser surgery Grant 5,071,222 - Laakmann , et al. December 10, 1 | 1991-12-10 |
Hollow lightpipe and lightpipe tip using a low refractive index inner layer Grant 5,005,944 - Laakmann , et al. April 9, 1 | 1991-04-09 |
Hollow lightpipe using a low refractive index inner layer Grant 4,805,987 - Laakmann , et al. February 21, 1 | 1989-02-21 |
Hollow waveguide having plural layer dielectric Grant 4,688,893 - Laakmann August 25, 1 | 1987-08-25 |
Hollow waveguides having disparate dielectric overcoatings Grant 4,688,892 - Laakmann August 25, 1 | 1987-08-25 |
Hollow waveguide Grant 4,652,083 - Laakmann March 24, 1 | 1987-03-24 |
Sealed-off RF excited CO.sub.2 lasers and method of manufacturing such lasers Grant 4,393,506 - Laakmann , et al. July 12, 1 | 1983-07-12 |
Television compatible thermal imaging system Grant 4,349,843 - Laakmann , et al. September 14, 1 | 1982-09-14 |
Waveguide gas laser with high frequency transverse discharge excitation Grant 4,169,251 - Laakmann September 25, 1 | 1979-09-25 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.