La Joie; Michael L.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for La Joie; Michael L..The latest application filed is for "method and apparatus for network bandwidth conservation".
- La Joie; Michael L. - Stamford CT
- La Joie; Michael L. - Venice CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Personal content server apparatus and methods Grant 8,280,982 - La Joie , et al. October 2, 2 | 2012-10-02 |
| Method and apparatus for network bandwidth conservation Grant 8,094,656 - La Joie January 10, 2 | 2012-01-10 |
| Method and apparatus for network bandwidth conservation Grant 7,567,565 - La Joie July 28, 2 | 2009-07-28 |
| Method and apparatus for network bandwidth conservation App 20090007199 - La Joie; Michael L. | 2009-01-01 |
| Personal content server apparatus and methods App 20070276925 - La Joie; Michael L. ; et al. | 2007-11-29 |
| Method and apparatus for network bandwidth conservation App 20060171390 - La Joie; Michael L. | 2006-08-03 |
| Method and apparatus for processing audio and graphic images to create an interleaved file suitable for use as a CD-ROM product Grant 5,440,677 - Case , et al. August 8, 1 | 1995-08-08 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 