loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Kyoto Ceramic Kabushiki Kaisha.The latest application filed is for "activated carbon formed body and method of producing the same".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Activated carbon formed body and method of producing the same Grant 4,518,704 - Okabayashi , et al. May 21, 1 | 1985-05-21 |
Method of producing dense sintered silicon carbide body from polycarbosilane Grant 4,374,793 - Koga , et al. February 22, 1 | 1983-02-22 |
Supporting member for paper-making screen in paper machines Grant 4,363,701 - Kawae , et al. December 14, 1 | 1982-12-14 |
Ceramic heater Grant 4,357,526 - Yamamoto , et al. November 2, 1 | 1982-11-02 |
Silicon-semiconductor-type thermal head Grant 4,213,030 - Kawamura , et al. July 15, 1 | 1980-07-15 |
Somatic element of single crystalline sapphire ceramics Grant 4,122,605 - Hirabayashi , et al. October 31, 1 | 1978-10-31 |
Method of producing dense sintered silicon carbide body from polycarbosilanes Grant 4,105,455 - Koga , et al. August 8, 1 | 1978-08-08 |
Device for implanting an artificial endosseous element of ceramics and an implant method for use of the same Grant 4,086,701 - Kawahara , et al. May 2, 1 | 1978-05-02 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.