Kroyer; Karl Kristian Kobs
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Kroyer; Karl Kristian Kobs.The latest application filed is for "apparatus for the production of a fibrous web".
- Kroyer; Karl Kristian Kobs - Monte Carlo MC
- Kroyer; Karl Kristian Kobs - Viby J DK
- Kroyer; Karl Kristian Kobs - Copenhagen DK
- Kroyer; Karl Kristian Kobs - DK-8100 Arhus C. DK
- Kroyer; Karl Kristian Kobs - Aarhus-Viby DK
- Kroyer; Karl Kristian Kobs - 8260 Vigy J. DK
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Apparatus for the production of a fibrous web Grant 4,494,278 - Kroyer , et al. January 22, 1 | 1985-01-22 |
| Production of fibrous sheet material Grant 4,097,640 - Curry , et al. June 27, 1 | 1978-06-27 |
| Molding apparatus for ribbed product Grant 4,033,709 - Kroyer July 5, 1 | 1977-07-05 |
| Apparatus for the deposition of a uniform layer of dry fibres on a foraminous forming surface Grant 4,014,635 - Kroyer March 29, 1 | 1977-03-29 |
| Methods of preparing ceramic material Grant 3,942,966 - Kroyer , et al. March 9, 1 | 1976-03-09 |
| Cooking Utensil With Gauge Grant 3,736,861 - Kroyer , et al. June 5, 1 | 1973-06-05 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 