loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Krivts; Igor.The latest application filed is for "device and method for estimation of pulmonary function characteristics".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Device and method for estimation of pulmonary function characteristics Grant 10,687,735 - Krivts , et al. | 2020-06-23 |
Device And Method For Estimation Of Pulmonary Function Characteristics App 20200046255 - KRIVTS; Igor ;   et al. | 2020-02-13 |
Electrostatic chuck for wafer metrology and inspection equipment Grant 7,430,104 - Litman , et al. September 30, 2 | 2008-09-30 |
Chamber elements defining a movable internal chamber Grant 6,899,765 - Krivts , et al. May 31, 2 | 2005-05-31 |
Deflection method and system for use in a charged particle beam column Grant 6,825,475 - Petrov , et al. November 30, 2 | 2004-11-30 |
Electrostatic chuck for wafer metrology and inspection equipment App 20040179323 - Litman, Alon ;   et al. | 2004-09-16 |
Deflection method and system for use in a charged particle beam column App 20040056207 - Petrov, Igor ;   et al. | 2004-03-25 |
Chamber elements defining a movable internal chamber App 20030185715 - Krivts, Igor ;   et al. | 2003-10-02 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.