Krausche; Christian
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Krausche; Christian.The latest application filed is for "use of oligo-n,n-bis(3-aminopropyl)methylamine as curing agent for epoxy resins".
- Krausche; Christian - Ruedlingen CH
- KRAUSCHE; Christian - Rudlingen CH
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Use of oligo-N,N-bis(3-aminopropyl)methylamine as curing agent for epoxy resins Grant 10,544,256 - Panchenko , et al. Ja | 2020-01-28 |
| Use Of Oligo-n,n-bis(3-aminopropyl)methylamine As Curing Agent For Epoxy Resins App 20180201721 - PANCHENKO; Alexander ; et al. | 2018-07-19 |
| Use Of 2,5-bis(aminomethyl)furan As A Hardener For Epoxy Resins App 20160185896 - PANCHENKO; Alexander ; et al. | 2016-06-30 |
| Coating Compositions Comprising Conductive Fillers App 20160130448 - EICHFELDER; Andreas ; et al. | 2016-05-12 |
| Dispersions comprising functionalized oxidic nanoparticles Grant 8,940,814 - Karpov , et al. January 27, 2 | 2015-01-27 |
| Dispersions Comprising Functionalized Oxidic Nanoparticles App 20110245391 - Karpov; Andrey ; et al. | 2011-10-06 |
| Silane-modified Nanoparticles Made Of Metal Oxides App 20110245392 - Karpov; Andrey ; et al. | 2011-10-06 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 