loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Kramer; Pieter.The latest application filed is for "reflective optical record carrier".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Reflective optical record carrier Grant 5,068,846 - Kramer November 26, 1 | 1991-11-26 |
Process for manufacturing the inner tube element for a double tube coring apparatus Grant 4,569,710 - Lambot , et al. February 11, 1 | 1986-02-11 |
Inner tube element for a double tube coring apparatus and process for the manufacture of this tube element Grant 4,428,602 - Lambot , et al. January 31, 1 | 1984-01-31 |
Videodisc with undulating nested tracks Grant 4,223,347 - Bouwhuis , et al. September 16, 1 | 1980-09-16 |
Apparatus for optically reading a phase-modulated optical record carrier Grant 4,160,269 - Kramer , et al. * July 3, 1 | 1979-07-03 |
Video disc with phase structure Grant 4,041,530 - Kramer , et al. August 9, 1 | 1977-08-09 |
Apparatus for reading a flat reflecting record carrier with autofocusing means Grant 3,876,841 - Kramer , et al. April 8, 1 | 1975-04-08 |
Apparatus For Aligning A Mask With Respect To A Semiconductor Substrate Grant 3,811,779 - Jacobs , et al. May 21, 1 | 1974-05-21 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.