loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Kramer; Garrett.The latest application filed is for "marine source to borehole electromagnetic mapping of sub-bottom electrical resistivity".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
System and method for elevated source to borehole electromagnetic survey Grant 10,024,995 - Kramer , et al. July 17, 2 | 2018-07-17 |
Removing effects of near surface geology from surface-to-borehole electromagnetic data Grant 8,188,749 - Wilt , et al. May 29, 2 | 2012-05-29 |
Marine Source To Borehole Electromagnetic Mapping Of Sub-Bottom Electrical Resistivity App 20120130641 - Morrison; H. Frank ;   et al. | 2012-05-24 |
Removing Effects Of Near Surface Geology From Surface-to-borehole Electromagnetic Data App 20110050232 - Wilt; Michael ;   et al. | 2011-03-03 |
Removing effects of near surface geology from surface-to-borehole electromagnetic data Grant 7,852,087 - Wilt , et al. December 14, 2 | 2010-12-14 |
System And Method For Elevated Source To Borehole Electromagnetic Survey App 20100225322 - Kramer; Garrett ;   et al. | 2010-09-09 |
Removing Effects Of Near Surface Geology From Surface-to-borehole Electromagnetic Data App 20090039889 - Wilt; Michael ;   et al. | 2009-02-12 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.